| Course of Employment and the Personal Comfort Doctrine |
|
| An employee injured in the course of employment is entitled to workers' compensation benefits. However, compensability may remain unaffected even if the injury occurred when the employee deviated from his specific job duties to engage in an activity that was purely personal in nature and solely for his own comfort. The personal comfort doctrine allows employees to slightly deviate from their job duties, within the usual time and space parameters of their employment, without losing workers' compensation protection. It is generally understood that employees should be able to tend to their physical needs, such as using the restroom, getting a drink of water, or even taking a break to smoke, during the course of their employment. More... |
|
|
| Compensation for Federal Employees |
|
| As opposed to state Workers' Compensation Acts, federal employees who receive on-the-job injuries are specifically covered by the Federal Employee Compensation Act (FECA). FECA operates much like state statutes; it outlines a no-fault system that provides federal employees with fixed benefits in exchange for the loss of the right to sue the government. FECA covers both the disability and death of a federal employee, and outlines the types of benefits available to a federal employee in either event. More... |
|
|
| Attorneys' Fees and Costs in Third-Party Actions |
|
| When an injured employee initiates a third-party action based on the injury he received in the course of his employment, most states require the employer or its workers' compensation insurance carrier to pay part of the attorneys' fees incurred in bringing the action. They are to pay the fees out of their share of the recovery. Though the majority calls for the employee and employer to share the burden of attorneys' fees, there is still variation among the states as to who is obligated to pay the fees and in what amount. More... |
|
|
| Loss of Hearing as an Occupational Disease |
|
| Occupational hearing loss is a prevalent condition in workers employed in noisy environments such as factories and repair shops. Several states recognize the gradual loss of hearing as a compensable condition and such recognition has also taken place under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. Generally, a six-month waiting period is required prior to the filing of a hearing loss claim and the employee must be removed from the noisy environment for that time frame. The degree of impairment is generally based on speech frequencies with points ranging between total deafness and no compensable deafness. The improvement in hearing with the use of a hearing aid is not accounted for. More... |
|
|
| Types of workers compensation laws |
|
| Applicability of the LHWCA requires that the situs and status tests be met, i.e. the injury must have occurred on United States navigable waters or adjoining area by a maritime worker as specified in the LHWCA. It appears that the LHWCA was conceived to fill a gap in workers' compensation coverage by providing benefits to those employees who were not injured on land, which would then be covered under the applicable state's Workers' Compensation Act. However, the expansion of the interpretation as to what is the "adjoining area" of navigable waters has allowed for conflicts of law questions to arise for maritime workers. Caselaw suggests that when the LHWCA does not clearly apply under the status and situs tests, each case will be examined on its own facts to determine the source of the injured employee's benefits. Notably, Louisiana denies state workers' compensation benefits to an employee who is covered by the LHWCA. More... |
|
|